Official Luthiers Forum!
http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/

Sanding back Epoxy
http://www-.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=5196
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Graham Steward [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:01 am ]
Post subject: 

I have decided I want to try out West System epoxy for my current build and have been looking through the archives for info.

It seems that some people like to sand the epoxy back to bare wood and just leave the epoxy in the pores. Others leave a thin coat of epoxy on the wood.


I'd like to hear from people who do it either way and why they like that option. I'm expecting to hear answers such as "it looks better this way" or "That's the way 'Bob the expert' does it so I do it that way also."

I have read that the epoxy really makes the wood grain stick out. Do you agree with that?

Thanks!!   

Author:  Don Williams [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:52 am ]
Post subject: 

Graham,
It all depends on what you're using for a finish.
In the case of something like KTM-9, you'll want to apply a water-thin wash coat on after you've sanded back and have everything completely level.
This realy pops the grain of the wood, which won't happen with straigh KTM-9.
If you're shooting lacquer, then vinyl sealer will pop the grain, so no need for the wash coat.
This is of course, just my opinion, but it works well for me.

Author:  Graham Steward [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:27 am ]
Post subject: 

Don,

I will be using KTM-9. So I'll try what you suggest.

Hesh,

Yes after posting I came across a link to the Doolin KTM page and read the same thing.

Thanks guys,

Author:  old man [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:29 am ]
Post subject: 

"That's the way 'Bob the expert' does it so I do it that way also."


Ron

Author:  Graham Steward [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:34 am ]
Post subject: 

Which way do you do it then Ron?

Author:  LarryH [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:52 am ]
Post subject: 

Graham, The problem with sanding back to bare wood in areas is you run the risk of getting different 'wetting' and color differences. And as mentioned any water base will not 'wet' as well as oil base and the difference can be huge and really ugly. Epoxy is NOT easy to work with IMHO but really pops the rgain as other have said.

Author:  old man [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:55 am ]
Post subject: 

Sorry, Graham, cheap shot.   I haven't done it. My first guitar is cherry, which doesn't require filling, and I used tru-oil on the neck, no filler there either. Smooth as a baby's posterior.

Ron

Author:  Graham Steward [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:51 am ]
Post subject: 

swish!

That's the sound of your joke flying over my head.   

Author:  arvey [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

I use thinned west system which I put on and then rub in and wipe off just as it starts to set up. Then I sand it back to bare wood leaving just the pores filled, no problem with "different wetting and colour differences as only the pores are filled. Very little sanding needed this way. One time I put it on thicker and tried to just level everything leaving just a thin layer. For me that diddent work, by the time I was happy I was going through the epoxy in spots and ended up sanding it all back.

Author:  Josh H [ Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

I have switched to sanding it back to the wood. I did a few where I left a very thin coat to "wet" the wood. It was fine until I buffed through the finish (KTM). If you buff through there is not a good way to touch it up. I ended up striping the top and refinishing.

So I now sand back to the wood and have switched to nitro.

Josh

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/